Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- tripscan [2025/09/04 03:04] – 194.32.229.100
+++ tripscan [2025/09/05 03:08] (current) – 45.11.21.7
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== tripscan ======
-The legal fight is far from over. Dozens of cases related to spending and appropriations are still being litigated. And the administration’s proposed pocket recission — which would cancel funding close enough to the end of the fiscal year that Congress is effectively powerless to stop it — is sure to be challenged in court, too.
+Just over seven months into his second term, President Donald Trump has made significant headway toward his goal of weakening Congress’ centuries-old power of the purse — pushing the boundaries of executive authority and blocking what Democrats argue amounts to nearly a half-trillion dollars the administration is legally required to spend.
-[[https://tripskan39.cc/|tripscan]]
+[[https://tripscan39.org/|tripscan войти]]
-House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the move a “brazenly unlawful scam” and referred to Trump as a “wannabe King.” And the top Democrat on the Senate spending panel, Sen. Patty Murray, said Congress should reject the “ridiculous, illegal maneuver.”
+Now, Trump’s collision course with Congress is rapidly intensifying as he will be forced into a high-stakes negotiation with Democrats to fund the government by September 30. The administration rolled what amounted to a hand grenade into the spending talks just before Congress returned to Washington this week by proposing to cancel $4.9 billion of foreign aid through what’s known as a “pocket recission,” a tactic that Democrats — and the top Republican Senate appropriator — said was illegal.
-“Republicans should not accept Russ Vought’s brazen attempt to usurp their own power. No president has a line-item veto—and certainly not a retroactive line-item veto,” the Washington state Democrat said last week.
+“This is a big deal… [Trump] has concentrated all this power in his hands,” Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations panel, said in an interview hours after the White House’s latest gambit to block foreign aid spending. “They are running around illegally stealing taxpayer money, and it is a unilateral partisan act that excludes any cooperation with Democrats.”
-And the move has met some resistance from members of the president’s own party. Top Senate appropriator Susan Collins called it “a clear violation of the law,” while Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski argued that “Congress alone bears the constitutional responsibility for funding our government, and any effort to claw back resources outside of the appropriations process undermines that responsibility.”